UCMJ Article 103 – Captured or Abandoned Property

UCMJ Article 103 punishes misconduct involving captured or abandoned property during military operations. When U.S. forces seize enemy property or encounter abandoned property in the field, it is not for individual use or profit. Such property belongs to the United States and must be safeguarded, collected, and properly disposed of according to orders. Misuse or theft of captured or abandoned property undermines discipline, damages relations with civilians, and may violate the law of war.

The article covers looting, theft, personal appropriation, and negligent handling of captured or abandoned property. It protects both military efficiency and U.S. credibility in international operations.

Key Elements

The prosecution must prove:

  1. That certain property was captured from the enemy or abandoned in the field.
  2. That the accused took, sold, wasted, destroyed, or otherwise misused the property.
  3. That the accused acted without proper authority.
  4. That the act was intentional, willful, or negligent, depending on the specification.

The government must show that the property was enemy-owned or abandoned and not authorized for personal use.

Scope and Application

Article 103 applies to any type of property seized in military operations, including weapons, vehicles, supplies, livestock, or civilian property lawfully taken. It also applies to abandoned property, whether enemy or civilian, found in operational areas.

The article prohibits:

  • Looting or taking property for personal gain.
  • Selling captured goods.
  • Destroying or wasting property without military necessity.
  • Neglecting to secure captured or abandoned property.

All such property must be turned over to proper authorities.

Punishment

Maximum punishment varies depending on the nature of the misconduct:

  • Looting or selling: Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for up to 10 years.
  • Wrongful appropriation or misuse: Lesser confinement terms but still severe penalties.
  • Neglecting to secure property: Bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of pay, and confinement for up to 1 year.

The penalties reflect the seriousness of looting and misappropriation in wartime.

Defenses

Possible defenses include:

  • Lawful authority: If the accused acted under orders to dispose of or use the property.
  • Mistake of fact: Believing the property was lawfully available or personally owned.
  • Military necessity: If destruction or use was required by combat or operational conditions.
  • Lack of intent: For negligence-based charges, proof of willfulness may not be sufficient.

Examples

If a soldier keeps an enemy pistol as a personal souvenir without authorization, Article 103 applies. If Marines sell captured supplies for personal gain, that is punishable. If an airman destroys abandoned civilian property out of spite, it is a violation. On the other hand, if a commander orders property destroyed to prevent enemy use, that is lawful.

Conclusion

UCMJ Article 103 enforces discipline in handling captured and abandoned property. It ensures that such items are secured for the benefit of the United States, not misused for personal gain. By punishing looting, waste, and neglect, the article protects operational effectiveness, civilian trust, and adherence to the law of war.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What counts as captured or abandoned property?
Any property seized from the enemy or left behind without an owner in operational areas. This can include weapons, vehicles, equipment, or civilian property lawfully seized.

2. Can service members keep souvenirs from the battlefield?
No, personal appropriation of captured or abandoned property is prohibited unless specifically authorized. Items must be turned over to proper authorities.

3. What is the maximum punishment?
Looting or selling captured property can result in confinement for up to 10 years, dishonorable discharge, and forfeiture of pay. Lesser misconduct carries lighter but still serious penalties.

4. Is negligent handling punishable?
Yes, failing to secure or protect captured or abandoned property can lead to confinement for up to 1 year and a bad-conduct discharge.

5. Does Article 103 apply only to enemy property?
No, it also applies to abandoned civilian property found in operational areas, if mishandled without authority.

6. What if property is destroyed for military necessity?
Lawful destruction to deny enemy use is not a violation. Military necessity is a recognized defense if the action was reasonable and authorized.

7. Can officers as well as enlisted members be charged?
Yes, Article 103 applies to all service members regardless of rank.

8. How does this article relate to the law of war?
Looting and misuse of property violate international law. Article 103 ensures compliance by criminalizing such acts in U.S. military law.

9. What if a service member thought the property was abandoned personal property?
A reasonable mistake of fact may serve as a defense if the accused believed the property was available for use or not covered by Article 103.

10. Why is Article 103 important?
Because mishandling captured or abandoned property undermines discipline, damages military reputation, and can inflame civilian hostility. It ensures U.S. forces act lawfully and professionally in conflict zones.

Sources

  • Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 903, Article 103
  • Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024 edition)
  • Army Regulation 27-10, Military Justice
  • Navy JAGMAN (Judge Advocate General’s Manual) § 0130
  • Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Military Justice
  • Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, United States v. Thompson, 32 C.M.R. 23 (1962)
  • Military Attorney Joseph L. Jordan, Articles of the UCMJ web page

This content is for informational purposes only. If you are facing issues related to Article 103 or any other UCMJ provision, you should consult a qualified military attorney.

Related:

  1. UCMJ Article 104 – Aiding the Enemy UCMJ Article 104 criminalizes any act of providing aid, comfort, or intelligence to the enemy. This provision is one of the most serious in military law because it addresses direct betrayal of the United States in times of armed conflict....
  2. UCMJ Article 98 – Noncompliance with Procedural Rules UCMJ Article 98 punishes officials who knowingly or willfully fail to comply with procedural rules in the administration of military justice. It applies to commanders, military judges, convening authorities, trial counsel, and others responsible for courts-martial proceedings. The article is...
  3. UCMJ Article 102 – Forcing a Safeguard UCMJ Article 102 criminalizes the act of forcing a safeguard. A safeguard is a formal protection or guarantee issued by a commander to protect persons, property, or places from harm by U.S. military forces. Safeguards are often written documents, posted...
  4. UCMJ Article 134 – Sentinel or Lookout: Offenses Against or By This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes misconduct either committed against a sentinel or lookout on duty, or misconduct by a sentinel or lookout who fails to properly perform their duties. Sentinels and lookouts hold critical positions in military security,...
  5. UCMJ Article 107 – Making False Official Statements UCMJ Article 107 punishes service members who knowingly make false official statements or entries, or who sign official documents knowing the information is false. Military justice depends on accuracy and honesty in official matters. Any deliberate falsehood in official documents,...
  6. UCMJ Article 108 – Damage, Wrongful Disposition, Sale, Loss or Destruction of U.S. Military Property UCMJ Article 108 addresses misconduct involving U.S. military property. The article criminalizes damaging, selling, destroying, misusing, or losing military property, whether through negligence or intentional acts. Because military property belongs to the United States and is essential for readiness, accountability...
  7. UCMJ Article 125 – Sodomy UCMJ Article 125 historically criminalized sodomy, defined as unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex, or with an animal. For decades, the article was broadly applied to both consensual and non-consensual acts. However, significant changes...
  8. UCMJ Article 105 – Misconduct as a Prisoner UCMJ Article 105 punishes service members who, while in the hands of the enemy as prisoners of war, engage in misconduct that harms the United States or provides aid to the enemy. Unlike ordinary prisoner discipline issues, this article targets...
  9. UCMJ Article 134 – Restriction Breaking Restriction breaking is an enumerated offense under Article 134 that punishes service members who unlawfully break restriction imposed by lawful authority. Restriction is a form of non-judicial punishment, pretrial restraint, or administrative control that limits a service member’s movements to...
  10. UCMJ Article 120c – Other Sexual Misconduct UCMJ Article 120c criminalizes forms of sexual misconduct not specifically covered under Articles 120 or 120b. It was created to ensure that acts such as indecent exposure, voyeurism, and indecent visual recording are addressed under military law. This article reflects...
  11. UCMJ Article 99 – Misbehavior Before the Enemy UCMJ Article 99 criminalizes acts of cowardice, misbehavior, or misconduct committed in the presence of the enemy. It is one of the most severe offenses in military law because it deals directly with conduct in combat situations where unit cohesion,...
  12. UCMJ Article 100 – Compelling Surrender UCMJ Article 100 punishes any service member who compels or attempts to compel the surrender of a command, unit, post, military property, or personnel to an enemy through misconduct, cowardice, or neglect of duty. This provision addresses the extreme breach...
  13. UCMJ Article 126 – Arson UCMJ Article 126 criminalizes the act of willfully and maliciously burning or setting fire to property. The article distinguishes between burning property belonging to the United States and property belonging to another person. Arson is treated as a serious offense...
  14. UCMJ Article 112a – Wrongful Use of Controlled Substances UCMJ Article 112a criminalizes the wrongful use, possession, distribution, manufacture, or introduction of controlled substances into military installations, aircraft, vessels, or vehicles. This provision was added in 1982 to create a specific drug offense under the UCMJ, separating drug-related misconduct...
  15. UCMJ Article 134 – Kidnapping Kidnapping under Article 134 punishes the unlawful seizing, confining, inveigling, decoying, or carrying away of another person against their will. The offense is extremely serious because it violates personal liberty, threatens safety, and undermines public trust in the armed forces....