UCMJ Article 106 – Spies

UCMJ Article 106 criminalizes acts of spying against the United States in time of war. A spy is someone who, without lawful authority and under false pretenses, collects or attempts to collect information with the intent of communicating it to the enemy. Spying undermines national security and places military operations at risk. Because of its gravity, spying under Article 106 is one of the very few UCMJ offenses that expressly authorizes the death penalty.

This article applies both to members of the armed forces and, in certain circumstances, to civilians subject to military jurisdiction. The provision emphasizes the need to protect sensitive information and ensure that enemies cannot exploit vulnerabilities in U.S. defenses.

Key Elements

To prove spying under Article 106, the prosecution must establish:

  1. That the accused collected, attempted to collect, or communicated information.
  2. That the information was related to national defense or military operations.
  3. That the act was done clandestinely or under false pretenses.
  4. That the purpose was to provide the information to the enemy in time of war.

All four elements must be met. Simply gathering information is not spying unless it is done secretly and with intent to help the enemy.

Scope and Application

Spying is broader than treason because it requires clandestine activity and intent to aid the enemy during armed conflict. It may involve disguises, infiltration, or posing as a civilian. Article 106 applies in wartime, but espionage statutes under federal law cover peacetime spying.

Examples include:

  • A service member secretly passing battle plans to enemy agents.
  • An infiltrator disguised as a civilian collecting troop movements.
  • A person photographing military installations with intent to aid the enemy.

Punishment

  • Maximum penalty: Death.
  • Alternative punishments: Life imprisonment, dishonorable discharge, total forfeiture of pay and allowances, and long-term confinement.

The authorization of the death penalty underscores the seriousness of betraying the United States to hostile forces in wartime.

Defenses

Possible defenses include:

  • Lack of intent: If the accused did not intend to communicate the information to the enemy.
  • No false pretenses: If the accused acted openly and with lawful authority, the conduct may not qualify as spying.
  • Not wartime: Article 106 applies specifically in time of war. Outside wartime, espionage statutes apply instead.
  • Mistake of fact: If the accused did not know they were dealing with enemy agents.

Examples

If a soldier disguises themselves as a civilian and attempts to gather intelligence for the enemy, Article 106 applies. If a Marine secretly delivers classified documents to enemy forces during combat, it constitutes spying. Conversely, if a service member lawfully collects information as part of official duties, it is not spying.

Conclusion

UCMJ Article 106 treats spying as one of the gravest crimes in military law. By authorizing the death penalty, the article reflects the danger spying poses to missions, national security, and the lives of fellow service members. It ensures that loyalty to the United States remains absolute, especially in times of war.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What makes spying different from espionage?
Spying under Article 106 requires wartime, clandestine activity, and intent to aid the enemy. Espionage under federal law can apply in peacetime and covers broader conduct.

2. Who can be charged under Article 106?
Both service members and, under certain conditions, civilians subject to military jurisdiction during wartime.

3. What is the maximum punishment?
Death, although courts may impose life imprisonment or lesser punishments instead.

4. Is collecting information always spying?
No, it must be done secretly, without lawful authority, and with intent to aid the enemy. Ordinary intelligence work under lawful orders is not spying.

5. Does Article 106 apply only on the battlefield?
No, spying can occur anywhere if it involves wartime intelligence gathered secretly to benefit the enemy.

6. Can duress be a defense?
Yes, if the accused acted under immediate threat of death or serious harm, though courts scrutinize such claims closely.

7. Does the article apply during training or peacetime?
No, it applies only in time of war. Peacetime spying is prosecuted under espionage laws.

8. What is meant by “false pretenses”?
Using disguise, deception, or concealment to gather information secretly. For example, posing as a civilian or noncombatant.

9. How does Article 106 protect national security?
By deterring betrayal and punishing those who secretly aid the enemy during wartime. It protects operations, plans, and lives.

10. Why is the death penalty authorized?
Because spying in wartime can lead to massive losses of life and mission failure. The harshest penalty reflects its extreme danger.

Sources

  • Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 906, Article 106
  • Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024 edition)
  • Army Regulation 27-10, Military Justice
  • Navy JAGMAN (Judge Advocate General’s Manual) § 0133
  • Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Military Justice
  • Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, United States v. Batchelor, 7 C.M.R. 12 (1953)
  • Military Attorney Joseph L. Jordan, Articles of the UCMJ web page

This content is for informational purposes only. If you are facing issues related to Article 106 or any other UCMJ provision, you should consult a qualified military attorney.

Related:

  1. UCMJ Article 103 – Captured or Abandoned Property UCMJ Article 103 punishes misconduct involving captured or abandoned property during military operations. When U.S. forces seize enemy property or encounter abandoned property in the field, it is not for individual use or profit. Such property belongs to the United...
  2. UCMJ Article 104 – Aiding the Enemy UCMJ Article 104 criminalizes any act of providing aid, comfort, or intelligence to the enemy. This provision is one of the most serious in military law because it addresses direct betrayal of the United States in times of armed conflict....
  3. UCMJ Article 98 – Noncompliance with Procedural Rules UCMJ Article 98 punishes officials who knowingly or willfully fail to comply with procedural rules in the administration of military justice. It applies to commanders, military judges, convening authorities, trial counsel, and others responsible for courts-martial proceedings. The article is...
  4. UCMJ Article 101 – Improper Use of Countersign UCMJ Article 101 punishes the improper use of countersigns, parole words, or watchwords used in military operations. A countersign is a security measure used by guards and sentries to distinguish friend from foe, especially in combat or high-security environments. Misuse...
  5. UCMJ Article 102 – Forcing a Safeguard UCMJ Article 102 criminalizes the act of forcing a safeguard. A safeguard is a formal protection or guarantee issued by a commander to protect persons, property, or places from harm by U.S. military forces. Safeguards are often written documents, posted...
  6. UCMJ Article 99 – Misbehavior Before the Enemy UCMJ Article 99 criminalizes acts of cowardice, misbehavior, or misconduct committed in the presence of the enemy. It is one of the most severe offenses in military law because it deals directly with conduct in combat situations where unit cohesion,...
  7. UCMJ Article 100 – Compelling Surrender UCMJ Article 100 punishes any service member who compels or attempts to compel the surrender of a command, unit, post, military property, or personnel to an enemy through misconduct, cowardice, or neglect of duty. This provision addresses the extreme breach...
  8. UCMJ Article 134 – Willful Discharge of Firearm Under Circumstances to Endanger Human Life This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who willfully discharge a firearm in a manner that endangers or could endanger human life. Unlike negligent discharge (which involves carelessness), this offense requires proof that the accused acted willfully and...
  9. UCMJ Article 112a – Wrongful Use of Controlled Substances UCMJ Article 112a criminalizes the wrongful use, possession, distribution, manufacture, or introduction of controlled substances into military installations, aircraft, vessels, or vehicles. This provision was added in 1982 to create a specific drug offense under the UCMJ, separating drug-related misconduct...
  10. UCMJ Article 117 – Provoking Speeches or Gestures UCMJ Article 117 makes it an offense for a service member to use provoking or reproachful words or gestures toward another person subject to the UCMJ. The purpose of this article is to prevent fights, maintain discipline, and preserve harmony...
  11. UCMJ Article 120a – Stalking UCMJ Article 120a criminalizes stalking by service members. Stalking is defined as engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to fear death or bodily harm, or to suffer significant emotional...
  12. UCMJ Article 119 – Manslaughter UCMJ Article 119 punishes the unlawful killing of another human being without the aggravating factors that make the crime murder under Article 118. Manslaughter recognizes that some killings occur without premeditation or intent to commit murder, but they are still...
  13. UCMJ Article 105 – Misconduct as a Prisoner UCMJ Article 105 punishes service members who, while in the hands of the enemy as prisoners of war, engage in misconduct that harms the United States or provides aid to the enemy. Unlike ordinary prisoner discipline issues, this article targets...
  14. UCMJ Article 134 – Debt, Dishonorably Failing to Pay This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who dishonorably fail to pay a lawful debt. Financial responsibility is considered part of military discipline because failure to meet obligations harms trust, damages the armed forces’ reputation, and can disrupt...
  15. UCMJ Article 93 – Cruelty and Maltreatment UCMJ Article 93 criminalizes cruelty, oppression, or maltreatment of any person subject to a service member’s orders. This provision is not limited to physical abuse. It covers acts of abuse of authority, whether through physical harm, threats, humiliation, harassment, or...