UCMJ Article 125 – Sodomy

UCMJ Article 125 historically criminalized sodomy, defined as unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex, or with an animal. For decades, the article was broadly applied to both consensual and non-consensual acts. However, significant changes occurred following U.S. Supreme Court decisions and congressional amendments. Today, Article 125 primarily applies to forcible sodomy and bestiality, not consensual sexual activity between adults.

The narrowing of Article 125 reflects evolving constitutional law, particularly the decision in Lawrence v. Texas (2003), which invalidated criminal laws against private, consensual sexual conduct. Congress later amended the UCMJ in 2014 and subsequent years, aligning military law with constitutional protections while still punishing coercive or abusive conduct.

Key Elements

Forcible sodomy:

  1. The accused engaged in unnatural carnal copulation with another person.
  2. The act was done by force and without consent.
  3. The act was wrongful.

Bestiality:

  1. The accused engaged in unnatural carnal copulation with an animal.
  2. The act was wrongful.

“Unnatural carnal copulation” generally means contact between the penis and the mouth or anus, however slight.

Scope and Application

Article 125 now focuses on two areas:

  • Forcible sodomy: Sexual acts involving force, threat, or when the victim is incapable of consent.
  • Bestiality: Sexual acts involving animals, which remain categorically unlawful.

Consensual sodomy between adults is no longer punishable. This change ensures compliance with constitutional rights while maintaining accountability for coercive or exploitative acts.

Punishment

  • Forcible sodomy: Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for up to life.
  • Bestiality: Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for up to 5 years.

Defenses

Possible defenses include:

  • Consent: For adult-to-adult acts, consensual sodomy is not punishable.
  • Lack of force: If the government cannot prove force or lack of consent.
  • False accusation: Defense may challenge credibility or evidence.
  • Mistake of fact: The accused reasonably believed the other person consented.

Examples

If a soldier forces another service member to perform oral sex, Article 125 applies as forcible sodomy. If a Marine engages in a sexual act with an animal, it is bestiality under Article 125. However, if two adult service members engage in consensual oral or anal sex in private, that conduct is no longer punishable under this article.

Conclusion

Article 125 has evolved significantly, shifting from a broad prohibition on sodomy to a targeted provision against forcible sodomy and bestiality. This ensures that military law complies with constitutional protections while preserving accountability for coercive and exploitative sexual misconduct. The article remains a serious tool for punishing wrongful acts that undermine discipline, safety, and dignity.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is consensual sodomy still a crime under Article 125?
No. Since the 2014 amendments and constitutional rulings like Lawrence v. Texas, consensual sodomy between adults is no longer punishable under military law. The article now applies only to forcible sodomy and bestiality. This change protects service members’ private rights while maintaining discipline against abuse.

2. What is the maximum punishment for forcible sodomy?
Forcible sodomy carries a maximum punishment of life imprisonment, dishonorable discharge, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances. This reflects the seriousness of coercive sexual violence. The severity of sentencing often depends on the circumstances, including the level of force used and the victim’s vulnerability.

3. How does Article 125 define sodomy?
It defines sodomy as unnatural carnal copulation, which involves penetration, however slight, of the mouth or anus by the penis. Ejaculation is not required to complete the offense. This technical definition has been part of military law for decades, though its scope has narrowed with legal reforms.

4. What is bestiality under the UCMJ?
Bestiality is engaging in unnatural carnal copulation with an animal. It is always unlawful and carries severe penalties, including dishonorable discharge and confinement for up to 5 years. The prohibition reflects public policy, animal welfare, and military discipline concerns.

5. Can mistake of fact be a defense to forcible sodomy?
Yes, if the accused reasonably believed the other person consented, mistake of fact may be raised as a defense. However, the belief must be honest and reasonable under the circumstances. The government often challenges this defense by presenting evidence of threats, force, or incapacity.

6. Does Article 125 apply overseas?
Yes, Article 125 applies to service members worldwide, whether stationed in the United States or abroad. The UCMJ follows service members wherever they are, ensuring consistent standards of accountability. This global reach is essential for maintaining discipline across the force.

7. How does Article 125 relate to Article 120?
Article 120 addresses a wide range of sexual assault crimes, including rape and abusive sexual contact. Article 125 is narrower, covering only forcible sodomy and bestiality. Both work together to ensure all serious forms of sexual misconduct are punishable.

8. What if the victim could not consent due to intoxication or sleep?
If the victim was incapable of consenting due to intoxication, unconsciousness, or another factor, the act may be prosecuted as forcible sodomy under Article 125. The law protects vulnerable victims from being exploited in such circumstances. Consent must always be knowing and voluntary.

9. Has Article 125 always been limited to forcible sodomy and bestiality?
No. Historically, Article 125 criminalized all sodomy, even consensual acts between adults. Following Lawrence v. Texas and congressional reforms, the scope was narrowed. This evolution demonstrates how military law adapts to constitutional standards.

10. Why does Article 125 remain important today?
Because it ensures accountability for coercive sexual misconduct and bestiality, both of which threaten dignity, safety, and discipline. While consensual private acts are no longer punishable, Article 125 continues to protect service members from abuse and uphold the integrity of the armed forces.

Sources

  • Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 925, Article 125
  • Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024 edition)
  • Army Regulation 27-10, Military Justice
  • Navy JAGMAN (Judge Advocate General’s Manual) § 0157
  • Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Military Justice
  • Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, United States v. Marcum, 60 M.J. 198 (2004)
  • Military Attorney Joseph L. Jordan, Articles of the UCMJ web page

This content is for informational purposes only. If you are facing issues related to Article 125 or any other UCMJ provision, you should consult a qualified military attorney.

Related:

  1. UCMJ Article 119a – Death or Injury of an Unborn Child UCMJ Article 119a punishes service members who cause the death of, or bodily injury to, an unborn child while engaged in conduct that violates the UCMJ. This article was added to align military law with federal protections for unborn children...
  2. UCMJ Article 120a – Stalking UCMJ Article 120a criminalizes stalking by service members. Stalking is defined as engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to fear death or bodily harm, or to suffer significant emotional...
  3. UCMJ Article 134 – Wrongful Interference with Adverse Administrative Proceedings This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who wrongfully interfere with adverse administrative proceedings. These proceedings include investigations, boards of inquiry, separation boards, correctional custody actions, or other administrative processes that can impose significant consequences short of criminal...
  4. UCMJ Article 133 – Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and Gentleman UCMJ Article 133 criminalizes conduct by commissioned officers, cadets, or midshipmen that dishonors or disgraces them personally, or seriously compromises their standing as officers. The article is intentionally broad, designed to uphold the integrity and character expected of military leaders....
  5. UCMJ Article 134 – Fleeing the Scene of an Accident Under Article 134, a service member who is involved in an accident and wrongfully leaves the scene without fulfilling legal responsibilities can be punished for fleeing the scene of an accident. The rule applies whether the accident involves government or...
  6. UCMJ Article 134 – The General Article UCMJ Article 134, known as the “General Article,” is a catch-all provision that criminalizes a wide range of misconduct not specifically addressed in other articles of the UCMJ. It punishes behavior that is prejudicial to good order and discipline in...
  7. UCMJ Article 134 – Jumping from Vessel into the Water Under Article 134, service members can be punished for wrongfully and willfully jumping into the water from a vessel. The offense may seem minor, but unauthorized jumping endangers lives, disrupts operations, and undermines the discipline required aboard military ships. Naval...
  8. UCMJ Article 87 – Missing Movement UCMJ Article 87 criminalizes the act of missing the movement of a ship, aircraft, or unit with which a service member is required to move. Unlike AWOL or desertion, Article 87 applies specifically to situations where a movement has been...
  9. UCMJ Article 92 – Failure to Obey Order or Regulation UCMJ Article 92 is one of the most frequently charged provisions in military law. It criminalizes three types of misconduct: (1) violation or failure to obey a lawful general order or regulation, (2) failure to obey any other lawful order,...
  10. UCMJ Article 128 – Assault UCMJ Article 128 criminalizes assault, which is the unlawful attempt or offer with force or violence to do bodily harm to another person. Assault includes both attempts to inflict injury and threats accompanied by the ability to carry them out....
  11. UCMJ Article 129 – Burglary UCMJ Article 129 criminalizes burglary, which is unlawfully breaking and entering the dwelling house of another in the nighttime with the intent to commit a criminal offense inside. Burglary is considered more serious than unlawful entry because it combines trespass...
  12. UCMJ Article 126 – Arson UCMJ Article 126 criminalizes the act of willfully and maliciously burning or setting fire to property. The article distinguishes between burning property belonging to the United States and property belonging to another person. Arson is treated as a serious offense...
  13. UCMJ Article 134 – Straggling This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who, without proper authority, fall behind, stray, or otherwise separate themselves from their unit, organization, or assigned duty while marching, moving, or on the march. Straggling undermines discipline, delays unit movement,...
  14. UCMJ Article 134 – Debt, Dishonorably Failing to Pay This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who dishonorably fail to pay a lawful debt. Financial responsibility is considered part of military discipline because failure to meet obligations harms trust, damages the armed forces’ reputation, and can disrupt...
  15. UCMJ Article 119 – Manslaughter UCMJ Article 119 punishes the unlawful killing of another human being without the aggravating factors that make the crime murder under Article 118. Manslaughter recognizes that some killings occur without premeditation or intent to commit murder, but they are still...