This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who offer, give, solicit, or accept anything of value with the intent to influence official action, or who wrongfully profit from their official position. Bribery and graft strike at the core of military integrity because they corrupt decision-making, damage trust, and discredit the armed forces.
Key Elements
Bribery
- That the accused gave, offered, or promised something of value (or solicited/accepted it).
- That the act was done with intent to influence an official act or decision.
- That the conduct was wrongful.
Graft
- That the accused wrongfully sought or accepted something of value.
- That the item of value was connected to the accused’s official duties or position.
- That the conduct was prejudicial to good order and discipline or was of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.
Scope and Application
This article covers:
- Paying a superior for favorable treatment.
- Accepting money or gifts in exchange for duty assignments.
- Using one’s official position to secure private benefits or kickbacks.
- Offering favors, promotions, or privileges in exchange for valuables.
The distinction: bribery requires intent to influence official action, while graft involves wrongful enrichment from one’s position even without direct influence on a specific act.
Punishment
- Bribery: Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for up to 10 years.
- Graft: Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for up to 3 years.
Defenses
Possible defenses include:
- Lack of intent: If the item was given or accepted without intent to influence an official act.
- Lawful gift or gratuity: If the exchange was permitted under regulations (e.g., small tokens, ceremonial gifts).
- Mistake of fact: If the accused reasonably believed the action was authorized.
- Insufficient connection: If the benefit was unrelated to official duties.
Examples
If a soldier pays money to avoid deployment, Article 134 bribery applies. If a Marine accepts gifts from contractors in exchange for favorable contracts, it qualifies as bribery or graft. If an airman uses rank to obtain discounted goods not available to others, it may be graft. Conversely, if a sailor receives an authorized retirement plaque paid for by peers, that is not wrongful.
Conclusion
Article 134 bribery and graft provisions ensure that military decisions remain free from corruption. By punishing both influence-seeking (bribery) and wrongful enrichment (graft), the UCMJ protects the integrity of command and the trust placed in service members.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What is the difference between bribery and graft?
Bribery requires intent to influence an official act, while graft involves wrongful profit from one’s official position, even without altering decisions. Both damage trust but differ in purpose.
2. What is the maximum punishment for bribery?
Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for up to 10 years. Graft carries up to 3 years. Bribery is treated more harshly because it directly corrupts official actions.
3. Can small gifts be considered bribery or graft?
Not usually. Authorized minor gifts, ceremonial items, or tokens within regulation are not punishable. The misconduct lies in wrongful intent or benefit.
4. Does the accused need to succeed in influencing someone?
No. The crime is complete once the offer, solicitation, or acceptance is made with wrongful intent. Success is not required.
5. Can contractors or civilians be involved in these cases?
Yes. If service members accept or offer benefits involving civilians that influence official duties, the offense still applies. Civilian misconduct may be prosecuted separately under federal law.
6. What if the accused thought the action was lawful?
A reasonable mistake of fact may serve as a defense. For example, believing a gift was permitted under regulations could negate wrongful intent.
7. Can commanders accept gifts from subordinates?
Generally no, unless permitted by regulation (e.g., group gifts under value limits). Accepting gifts tied to official action can constitute graft or bribery.
8. How do these offenses affect morale?
They create perceptions of favoritism, unfairness, and corruption, undermining trust in leadership. Strict enforcement preserves fairness and cohesion.
9. Can bribery and graft overlap with other UCMJ charges?
Yes. Related charges may include false official statements, larceny, or conduct unbecoming under Article 133. Prosecutors often charge multiple offenses.
10. Why does the military treat these offenses so severely?
Because corruption threatens mission success, fairness, and public trust. Strict punishment deters abuse of authority and ensures accountability.
Sources
- Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934, Article 134 (Bribery and Graft)
- Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024 edition)
- Army Regulation 27-10, Military Justice
- Navy JAGMAN (Judge Advocate General’s Manual) § 0166
- Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Military Justice
- Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, United States v. Marshall, 25 M.J. 32 (1987)
- Military Attorney Joseph L. Jordan, Articles of the UCMJ web page
This content is for informational purposes only. If you are facing issues related to Article 134 or any other UCMJ provision, you should consult a qualified military attorney.