UCMJ Article 134 – Debt, Dishonorably Failing to Pay

This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who dishonorably fail to pay a lawful debt. Financial responsibility is considered part of military discipline because failure to meet obligations harms trust, damages the armed forces’ reputation, and can disrupt unit morale. Not every unpaid debt is criminal — the government must prove the failure was dishonorable, showing deceit, evasion, or willful neglect.

Key Elements

The prosecution must prove:

  1. That the accused was indebted to a certain person or entity in a certain sum.
  2. That the debt was legal and enforceable.
  3. That the accused dishonorably failed to pay the debt.
  4. That, under the circumstances, the conduct was prejudicial to good order and discipline or was of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.

Scope and Application

Examples of dishonorable nonpayment include:

  • Writing bad checks and refusing to make them good.
  • Willfully ignoring repayment agreements despite ability to pay.
  • Evading creditors through deceit or false statements.
  • Refusing to honor debts that affect the reputation of the service (e.g., unpaid rent near bases).

Simple inability to pay due to hardship is not criminal. The dishonorable element distinguishes this offense from civil debt issues.

Punishment

  • Maximum punishment: Dismissal (for officers) or dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for up to 6 months.

Defenses

Possible defenses include:

  • No dishonor: If the failure to pay was due to genuine financial hardship rather than deceit.
  • No valid debt: If the debt was not legally enforceable.
  • Payment made: If the accused satisfied the debt before trial.
  • Mistake of fact: If the accused believed in good faith the debt was not owed.

Examples

If a soldier refuses to pay rent to a civilian landlord while spending freely on luxuries, Article 134 applies. If a Marine ignores repayment obligations despite having sufficient pay, it qualifies. If an airman deliberately avoids creditors by lying about their identity, it is punishable. Conversely, if a sailor cannot pay due to unexpected family emergencies and seeks assistance in good faith, it may not be dishonorable.

Conclusion

Article 134 debt offenses emphasize that financial integrity is part of military discipline. By punishing dishonorable failure to pay debts, the UCMJ ensures service members uphold personal responsibility and preserve the armed forces’ reputation for reliability and honor.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What makes failure to pay dishonorable under Article 134?
Dishonor involves deceit, evasion, or willful neglect. Mere inability to pay due to hardship is not enough. The prosecution must show misconduct that brings discredit to the armed forces.

2. What is the maximum punishment?
Dismissal or dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for up to 6 months. While relatively short confinement, the discharge is career-ending.

3. Can private debts be included?
Yes. Debts to landlords, banks, businesses, or individuals may all qualify if dishonorably unpaid. Both private and government-related debts fall under this article.

4. Does paying the debt before trial help?
Yes. While late payment does not erase the offense, it may mitigate punishment. Courts consider repayment as evidence of good faith.

5. How does this offense differ from bad check charges?
Writing bad checks may be prosecuted separately under worthless check provisions. Dishonorable failure to pay focuses on the ongoing refusal to honor lawful debts. Both can overlap.

6. What if the accused genuinely could not pay?
If inability was honest and not accompanied by dishonor, liability may not attach. The offense requires proof of wrongful intent. Courts consider financial circumstances carefully.

7. Does this apply overseas?
Yes. Service members who dishonorably fail to pay debts to local nationals overseas can face charges, especially if it harms relations or discredits the armed forces.

8. Can commanders handle debt issues administratively?
Yes. Many cases are addressed through counseling, non-judicial punishment, or financial management assistance before reaching court-martial. Severe or repeated dishonor, however, may lead to prosecution.

9. How does dishonorable debt affect unit morale?
It damages trust among service members, creates tension with local communities, and reflects poorly on the military. Financial irresponsibility undermines cohesion and professionalism.

10. Why is financial conduct part of military law?
Because service members represent the armed forces at all times. Dishonoring debts tarnishes the reputation of the military, disrupts discipline, and harms relations with civilians. Accountability in financial matters preserves the honor of the service.

Sources

  • Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934, Article 134 (Debt – Dishonorably Failing to Pay)
  • Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024 edition)
  • Army Regulation 27-10, Military Justice
  • Navy JAGMAN (Judge Advocate General’s Manual) § 0166
  • Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Military Justice
  • Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, United States v. Green, 44 C.M.R. 495 (1971)
  • Military Attorney Joseph L. Jordan, Articles of the UCMJ web page

This content is for informational purposes only. If you are facing issues related to Article 134 or any other UCMJ provision, you should consult a qualified military attorney.

Related:

  1. UCMJ Article 134 – Bribery and Graft This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who offer, give, solicit, or accept anything of value with the intent to influence official action, or who wrongfully profit from their official position. Bribery and graft strike at the core...
  2. UCMJ Article 123 – Forgery UCMJ Article 123 criminalizes forgery, which is the making, altering, or uttering of any writing in such a way that it falsely purports to be the act of another and is intended to defraud. Forgery undermines trust in military records,...
  3. UCMJ Article 122 – Robbery UCMJ Article 122 criminalizes robbery, which is the unlawful taking of property from another person or in their presence, against their will, by means of violence, force, or intimidation. Robbery is considered more serious than larceny under Article 121 because...
  4. UCMJ Article 133 – Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and Gentleman UCMJ Article 133 criminalizes conduct by commissioned officers, cadets, or midshipmen that dishonors or disgraces them personally, or seriously compromises their standing as officers. The article is intentionally broad, designed to uphold the integrity and character expected of military leaders....
  5. UCMJ Article 134 – The General Article UCMJ Article 134, known as the “General Article,” is a catch-all provision that criminalizes a wide range of misconduct not specifically addressed in other articles of the UCMJ. It punishes behavior that is prejudicial to good order and discipline in...
  6. UCMJ Article 134 – Mails: Depositing or Causing to Be Deposited Obscene Matters This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who knowingly deposit or cause to be deposited obscene, indecent, or lewd matter in the mail. The prohibition applies to letters, writings, drawings, photographs, films, or other material sent through the...
  7. UCMJ Article 131 – Perjury UCMJ Article 131 criminalizes perjury, which is willfully giving false testimony under a lawful oath in a judicial proceeding or official matter. Because the military justice system depends on honesty and integrity, lying under oath is treated as one of...
  8. UCMJ Article 134 – Bigamy Bigamy is one of the enumerated offenses under UCMJ Article 134, which punishes misconduct that is prejudicial to good order and discipline or that brings discredit upon the armed forces. Bigamy occurs when a service member, while already married, marries...
  9. UCMJ Article 126 – Arson UCMJ Article 126 criminalizes the act of willfully and maliciously burning or setting fire to property. The article distinguishes between burning property belonging to the United States and property belonging to another person. Arson is treated as a serious offense...
  10. UCMJ Article 134 – Specific Offenses Under the General Article While Article 134 serves as a broad catch-all provision of the UCMJ, the Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM) lists many specific offenses prosecuted under this article. These enumerated offenses cover misconduct that threatens good order and discipline or discredits the armed...
  11. UCMJ Article 93 – Cruelty and Maltreatment UCMJ Article 93 criminalizes cruelty, oppression, or maltreatment of any person subject to a service member’s orders. This provision is not limited to physical abuse. It covers acts of abuse of authority, whether through physical harm, threats, humiliation, harassment, or...
  12. UCMJ Article 134 – Sentinel or Lookout: Offenses Against or By This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes misconduct either committed against a sentinel or lookout on duty, or misconduct by a sentinel or lookout who fails to properly perform their duties. Sentinels and lookouts hold critical positions in military security,...
  13. UCMJ Article 134 – Kidnapping Kidnapping under Article 134 punishes the unlawful seizing, confining, inveigling, decoying, or carrying away of another person against their will. The offense is extremely serious because it violates personal liberty, threatens safety, and undermines public trust in the armed forces....
  14. UCMJ Article 134 – Public Record: Altering, Concealing, Removing, Mutilating, Obliterating, or Destroying This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who wrongfully alter, conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate, or destroy a public record. Public records include any official document, paper, file, or electronic record maintained by military or government authority. Because the...
  15. UCMJ Article 134 – Wrongful Interference with Adverse Administrative Proceedings This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who wrongfully interfere with adverse administrative proceedings. These proceedings include investigations, boards of inquiry, separation boards, correctional custody actions, or other administrative processes that can impose significant consequences short of criminal...