UCMJ Article 134 – False Swearing

False swearing under Article 134 occurs when a service member makes a false statement under oath that is not material to a judicial proceeding. Unlike perjury under Article 131, false swearing does not require the statement to be material or to affect the outcome of a case. It is enough that the oath was lawfully administered and that the accused knowingly made a false statement.

The offense ensures accountability and honesty in all official matters, not just in court. By punishing false swearing, the UCMJ preserves trust in military processes where sworn statements are required.

Key Elements

The prosecution must prove:

  1. That the accused took an oath or affirmation administered by lawful authority.
  2. That the accused made a certain statement under that oath.
  3. That the statement was false.
  4. That the accused did not believe the statement to be true.
  5. That the conduct was prejudicial to good order and discipline or was of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.

Scope and Application

False swearing applies to:

  • Oaths taken in administrative investigations.
  • Sworn statements during routine military matters.
  • False declarations that are not material to a trial but still undermine integrity.

This article differs from perjury because materiality is not required. A false statement, even if irrelevant to the matter at hand, may be punished if made under oath.

Punishment

  • Maximum punishment: Bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for up to 3 years.

Defenses

Possible defenses include:

  • Truth or honest belief: If the accused believed the statement was true.
  • No lawful oath: If the oath was not administered by proper authority.
  • No prejudice or discredit: If the false statement did not harm discipline or the reputation of the armed forces.
  • Ambiguity: If the statement was vague or reasonably misunderstood.

Examples

If a soldier lies under oath during a command investigation about minor details, Article 134 applies. If a Marine provides a sworn statement during an administrative process that they know is false, it qualifies. If an airman swears to a fact in an official affidavit while knowing it is untrue, it is false swearing.

Conclusion

False swearing under Article 134 reinforces the expectation that service members will be truthful whenever placed under oath. Even when the statement is not material to a trial, dishonesty under oath damages the credibility of the military justice system and undermines trust in official processes.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. How is false swearing different from perjury?
Perjury under Article 131 requires that the false statement be material to a judicial or official proceeding. False swearing under Article 134 punishes any knowingly false sworn statement, even if it is immaterial. The key difference is materiality. Both require proof that the accused knew the statement was false.

2. What is the maximum punishment for false swearing?
The maximum punishment is a bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for up to 3 years. This reflects the seriousness of dishonesty under oath, even outside judicial proceedings. Sentencing may vary depending on the context and harm caused.

3. Does the false statement need to affect the outcome of a case?
No. That is the major distinction from perjury. A statement can be punishable as false swearing even if it was irrelevant to the outcome. The offense lies in knowingly lying under oath, not in its effect. The focus is on preserving the integrity of the oath itself.

4. What if the accused thought the statement was true?
Then no offense exists. False swearing requires that the accused knew the statement was false at the time. Honest mistakes, faulty memory, or misunderstandings do not qualify. The prosecution must prove knowledge and intent beyond a reasonable doubt.

5. What kinds of oaths qualify under Article 134?
Any lawful oath or affirmation administered by proper authority. This includes command investigations, administrative proceedings, or other military processes where sworn statements are required. Informal promises or casual declarations do not count. The oath must be official and binding.

6. Can ambiguous or unclear statements be punished as false swearing?
Not usually. If a statement was vague, confusing, or reasonably misunderstood, it may not qualify as false swearing. The prosecution must prove the accused made a clear and knowingly false statement. Courts often look at context and clarity.

7. Does Article 134 false swearing apply outside judicial settings?
Yes. Unlike perjury, it applies broadly to administrative and investigative settings where oaths are used. For example, false sworn statements in Inspector General investigations can be prosecuted. This ensures accountability across military processes.

8. Can false swearing occur in written form?
Yes. Written affidavits, declarations, or any documents sworn under oath qualify. False written statements are treated the same as oral testimony. The key is that the statement was made under a lawful oath.

9. What if the oath was not properly administered?
If the oath was not given by someone with lawful authority, the charge of false swearing may not stand. A proper, lawful oath is required. However, other offenses, like false official statements, may still apply.

10. Why does the UCMJ punish false swearing separately from perjury?
Because honesty under oath is essential in all military processes, not just in court. False swearing protects the integrity of administrative and investigative systems. By punishing even immaterial lies, the UCMJ ensures service members remain truthful whenever sworn.

Sources

  • Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934, Article 134 (False Swearing)
  • Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024 edition)
  • Army Regulation 27-10, Military Justice
  • Navy JAGMAN (Judge Advocate General’s Manual) § 0166
  • Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Military Justice
  • Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, United States v. Kennedy, 12 C.M.R. 266 (1953)
  • Military Attorney Joseph L. Jordan, Articles of the UCMJ web page

This content is for informational purposes only. If you are facing issues related to Article 134 or any other UCMJ provision, you should consult a qualified military attorney.

Related:

  1. UCMJ Article 130 – Housebreaking UCMJ Article 130 criminalizes housebreaking, which is the unlawful entry of a building or structure with intent to commit a criminal offense inside. Unlike burglary under Article 129, housebreaking does not require nighttime entry or that the structure be a...
  2. UCMJ Article 134 – Disloyal Statements This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who make statements that show disloyalty toward the United States with the intent to promote disaffection or undermine loyalty to the nation. Because the armed forces depend on allegiance, discipline, and...
  3. UCMJ Article 106 – Spies UCMJ Article 106 criminalizes acts of spying against the United States in time of war. A spy is someone who, without lawful authority and under false pretenses, collects or attempts to collect information with the intent of communicating it to...
  4. UCMJ Article 134 – Obstructing Justice This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who wrongfully impede, interfere with, or obstruct the due administration of justice. The offense includes actions that delay, prevent, or corrupt investigations, judicial proceedings, or disciplinary processes. Because the military justice...
  5. UCMJ Article 131 – Perjury UCMJ Article 131 criminalizes perjury, which is willfully giving false testimony under a lawful oath in a judicial proceeding or official matter. Because the military justice system depends on honesty and integrity, lying under oath is treated as one of...
  6. UCMJ Article 134 – Debt, Dishonorably Failing to Pay This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who dishonorably fail to pay a lawful debt. Financial responsibility is considered part of military discipline because failure to meet obligations harms trust, damages the armed forces’ reputation, and can disrupt...
  7. UCMJ Article 134 – Mail: Taking, Opening, Secreting, Destroying, or Stealing This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who wrongfully interfere with mail. It covers taking, opening, secreting, destroying, or stealing letters, packages, or other mail matter entrusted to the postal system. Because the military depends on reliable communications...
  8. UCMJ Article 134 – Drunkenness (Disorderly Conduct) Under Article 134 of the UCMJ, drunkenness and disorderly conduct are punishable when they are prejudicial to good order and discipline or bring discredit upon the armed forces. Military service demands sobriety, professionalism, and reliability, and drunken behavior that disrupts...
  9. UCMJ Article 134 – Wrongful Refusal to Testify This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes a service member who wrongfully refuses to testify when lawfully required to do so. The integrity of the military justice system depends on witness testimony, and refusal to testify can obstruct investigations, delay...
  10. UCMJ Article 122 – Robbery UCMJ Article 122 criminalizes robbery, which is the unlawful taking of property from another person or in their presence, against their will, by means of violence, force, or intimidation. Robbery is considered more serious than larceny under Article 121 because...
  11. UCMJ Article 134 – Misprision of a Serious Offense Misprision under Article 134 punishes a service member who knows that a serious offense has been committed but fails to report it and instead conceals it. This misconduct undermines military justice by allowing crimes to go unreported and obstructs the...
  12. UCMJ Article 134 – Pandering and Prostitution This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who engage in prostitution or promote it through pandering. Prostitution is the act of offering or receiving sexual activity for money or other compensation. Pandering occurs when a service member compels,...
  13. UCMJ Article 82 – Solicitation UCMJ Article 82 defines the offense of solicitation. It punishes a service member who wrongfully solicits or advises another to commit a UCMJ offense, provided the solicitation was made with the intent that the offense actually be committed. The solicitation...
  14. UCMJ Article 133 – Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and Gentleman UCMJ Article 133 criminalizes conduct by commissioned officers, cadets, or midshipmen that dishonors or disgraces them personally, or seriously compromises their standing as officers. The article is intentionally broad, designed to uphold the integrity and character expected of military leaders....
  15. UCMJ Article 134 – Fleeing the Scene of an Accident Under Article 134, a service member who is involved in an accident and wrongfully leaves the scene without fulfilling legal responsibilities can be punished for fleeing the scene of an accident. The rule applies whether the accident involves government or...