UCMJ Article 134 – Indecent Language

Under Article 134, service members can be punished for using indecent language when such conduct is prejudicial to good order and discipline or brings discredit upon the armed forces. Indecent language means words or expressions that are grossly offensive to modesty, decency, or propriety, or that are intended to excite sexual desire or corrupt morals. The offense is not limited to in-person speech; it also applies to written, electronic, or digital communications.

Because the military demands professionalism and respect, indecent language is treated as incompatible with service values. It protects both the dignity of individuals and the reputation of the armed forces in the eyes of the public.

Key Elements

The prosecution must prove:

  1. That the accused orally or in writing communicated certain language to another person.
  2. That the language was indecent.
  3. That the communication was wrongful.
  4. That the conduct was prejudicial to good order and discipline or was of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.

Scope and Application

Indecent language may include:

  • Obscene or sexually explicit comments directed at others.
  • Vulgar or degrading remarks meant to shock or offend.
  • Sexually harassing communications via text, email, or social media.
  • Publicly using obscene language that undermines professionalism.

The offense is not intended to punish ordinary profanity or casual swearing unless it rises to the level of indecency. Courts examine context, audience, and intent.

Punishment

  • Maximum punishment: Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for up to 1 year.

Defenses

Possible defenses include:

  • Not indecent: Language was crude or profane but not indecent under the UCMJ definition.
  • Consent: In private, consensual communications, context may negate wrongfulness.
  • Freedom of expression: If the communication was artistic, satirical, or otherwise protected.
  • Lack of prejudice or discredit: If the language did not harm discipline or reputation.

Examples

If a soldier sends sexually explicit texts to a subordinate, Article 134 applies. If a Marine shouts obscene insults at civilians while in uniform, it qualifies as indecent language. If an airman writes vulgar graffiti in a shared barracks space, the act is punishable. On the other hand, private swearing among peers that does not meet the threshold of indecency may not qualify.

Conclusion

Article 134 indecent language offenses reinforce military expectations of professionalism, respect, and discipline. By punishing language that is obscene, sexually explicit, or grossly offensive, the article preserves the integrity of service members and the reputation of the armed forces.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What qualifies as indecent language under Article 134?
Indecent language includes words that are grossly offensive, obscene, or sexually explicit, or that corrupt morals. It goes beyond ordinary profanity to include speech that undermines decency and professionalism. The determination is based on context, audience, and intent. Courts require that the words be clearly indecent, not just rude.

2. How is indecent language different from ordinary profanity?
Profanity may be offensive but not rise to the level of indecency. Indecent language is more serious and includes sexual obscenity or gross vulgarity that shocks community standards. The key difference is that indecency is judged by its potential to degrade or corrupt. This ensures only the most serious language is punished.

3. Does indecent language have to be spoken in public?
No. It can be spoken privately, written, or sent electronically. Texts, emails, and social media posts all qualify if indecent. Even private communications may be punishable if wrongful and discrediting. Public context, however, usually aggravates the seriousness.

4. What is the maximum punishment for indecent language?
Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for up to 1 year. This reflects the military’s intolerance for grossly offensive or obscene language. The punishment may be less severe depending on context, but it can end a career. The maximum ensures deterrence across the force.

5. Can consensual sexual talk between adults be punished?
Usually not, unless it becomes public, involves subordinates, or otherwise harms discipline. Private consensual communication is less likely to be prosecuted. However, chain of command relationships or professional boundaries may still make such talk wrongful. Context always matters.

6. Does freedom of speech protect indecent language?
The First Amendment offers limited protection in the military. Indecent language that harms discipline or discredits the service can be restricted and punished. Military necessity often outweighs broad free speech rights. Courts balance free expression with the need for discipline.

7. What if the accused did not intend the words to be indecent?
Intent is relevant. If the accused reasonably believed the language was not indecent or was joking, that may mitigate liability. Still, recklessness or disregard for the offensive nature can be enough. Courts focus on both intent and the reasonable perception of the language.

8. Can indecent language overlap with sexual harassment?
Yes. Indecent language often overlaps with harassment and can lead to charges under multiple articles. For example, sexually explicit comments toward a subordinate may be indecent and harassment. Commanders often use Article 134 to reinforce zero tolerance.

9. Does Article 134 apply to online conduct?
Yes. Indecent language sent through social media, texts, or forums is punishable. Online misconduct is increasingly prosecuted under Article 134. The format does not matter; the wrongful use of words is key. Service members must be careful in digital communications.

10. Why is indecent language taken so seriously in the military?
Because it undermines professionalism, damages trust, and discredits the armed forces. Indecent language erodes discipline, especially when directed at subordinates or the public. Strict enforcement sets a standard of respect and integrity. The rule ensures the military maintains honor both internally and externally.

Sources

  • Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934, Article 134 (Indecent Language)
  • Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024 edition)
  • Army Regulation 27-10, Military Justice
  • Navy JAGMAN (Judge Advocate General’s Manual) § 0166
  • Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Military Justice
  • Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, United States v. French, 31 M.J. 57 (1990)
  • Military Attorney Joseph L. Jordan, Articles of the UCMJ web page

This content is for informational purposes only. If you are facing issues related to Article 134 or any other UCMJ provision, you should consult a qualified military attorney.

Related:

  1. UCMJ Article 134 – Mail: Taking, Opening, Secreting, Destroying, or Stealing This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who wrongfully interfere with mail. It covers taking, opening, secreting, destroying, or stealing letters, packages, or other mail matter entrusted to the postal system. Because the military depends on reliable communications...
  2. UCMJ Article 120a – Stalking UCMJ Article 120a criminalizes stalking by service members. Stalking is defined as engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to fear death or bodily harm, or to suffer significant emotional...
  3. UCMJ Article 134 – The General Article UCMJ Article 134, known as the “General Article,” is a catch-all provision that criminalizes a wide range of misconduct not specifically addressed in other articles of the UCMJ. It punishes behavior that is prejudicial to good order and discipline in...
  4. UCMJ Article 116 – Riot or Breach of Peace UCMJ Article 116 punishes service members who take part in a riot or who cause a disturbance that breaches the peace. Discipline and order are the backbone of military effectiveness, and collective disorder or violent conduct threatens not only the...
  5. UCMJ Article 87 – Missing Movement UCMJ Article 87 criminalizes the act of missing the movement of a ship, aircraft, or unit with which a service member is required to move. Unlike AWOL or desertion, Article 87 applies specifically to situations where a movement has been...
  6. UCMJ Article 133 – Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and Gentleman UCMJ Article 133 criminalizes conduct by commissioned officers, cadets, or midshipmen that dishonors or disgraces them personally, or seriously compromises their standing as officers. The article is intentionally broad, designed to uphold the integrity and character expected of military leaders....
  7. UCMJ Article 134 – Threat or Hoax Designed or Intended to Cause Panic or Public Fear This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who create or spread false threats, hoaxes, or warnings with the intent to cause panic, fear, or disruption. The military treats these acts as serious misconduct because they undermine discipline, disrupt...
  8. UCMJ Article 134 – Kidnapping Kidnapping under Article 134 punishes the unlawful seizing, confining, inveigling, decoying, or carrying away of another person against their will. The offense is extremely serious because it violates personal liberty, threatens safety, and undermines public trust in the armed forces....
  9. UCMJ Article 134 – Bigamy Bigamy is one of the enumerated offenses under UCMJ Article 134, which punishes misconduct that is prejudicial to good order and discipline or that brings discredit upon the armed forces. Bigamy occurs when a service member, while already married, marries...
  10. UCMJ Article 88 – Contempt Toward Officials UCMJ Article 88 makes it a crime for a commissioned officer to use contemptuous words against certain government officials. Specifically, it applies to contempt directed at the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a...
  11. UCMJ Article 134 – Pandering and Prostitution This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who engage in prostitution or promote it through pandering. Prostitution is the act of offering or receiving sexual activity for money or other compensation. Pandering occurs when a service member compels,...
  12. UCMJ Article 132 – Frauds Against the United States UCMJ Article 132 criminalizes acts of fraud by service members against the United States government. Fraud includes knowingly making false claims, presenting false documents, or concealing facts to obtain pay, allowances, property, or services. Because military operations rely on honesty,...
  13. UCMJ Article 114 – Dueling UCMJ Article 114 prohibits service members from engaging in dueling, provoking or accepting a challenge to duel, or acting as a second in arranging a duel. Dueling refers to a prearranged combat between two people, usually with deadly weapons, to...
  14. UCMJ Article 134 – Debt, Dishonorably Failing to Pay This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who dishonorably fail to pay a lawful debt. Financial responsibility is considered part of military discipline because failure to meet obligations harms trust, damages the armed forces’ reputation, and can disrupt...
  15. UCMJ Article 134 – Public Record: Altering, Concealing, Removing, Mutilating, Obliterating, or Destroying This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who wrongfully alter, conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate, or destroy a public record. Public records include any official document, paper, file, or electronic record maintained by military or government authority. Because the...