UCMJ Article 134 – Jumping from Vessel into the Water

Under Article 134, service members can be punished for wrongfully and willfully jumping into the water from a vessel. The offense may seem minor, but unauthorized jumping endangers lives, disrupts operations, and undermines the discipline required aboard military ships. Naval operations rely on strict adherence to orders, and even a single wrongful act can compromise safety and efficiency.

This enumerated offense ensures accountability for reckless conduct at sea or in port. It applies worldwide, regardless of whether the vessel is in combat, training, or docked.

Key Elements

The prosecution must prove:

  1. That the accused wrongfully and willfully jumped into the water.
  2. That the jump was from a vessel used by or belonging to the armed forces.
  3. That the conduct was prejudicial to good order and discipline or of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.

Scope and Application

Article 134 applies in situations such as:

  • Jumping overboard as a prank or dare.
  • Attempting to escape shipboard duties by going into the water.
  • Endangering rescue personnel who must respond to retrieve the jumper.
  • Disrupting operations, whether in open water or while the ship is docked.

It does not apply if the jump was ordered (for example, during man-overboard drills or lawful training).

Punishment

  • Maximum punishment: Bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for up to 6 months.

Defenses

Possible defenses include:

  • Accident: If the accused fell overboard unintentionally.
  • Lawful order: If the accused jumped under proper authority, such as in training.
  • Emergency: If the accused jumped to save a life or prevent serious harm.
  • No prejudice or discredit: If the act did not affect discipline or discredit the armed forces.

Examples

If a sailor jumps from a ship into the water as a prank, Article 134 applies. If a Marine intentionally dives overboard in port to avoid inspection, it qualifies. If an airman serving on a joint vessel jumps into the water during an unauthorized swim, it is punishable. By contrast, if a soldier falls accidentally or jumps in an emergency to save someone, it is not wrongful.

Conclusion

Jumping from a vessel into the water without authorization is a punishable offense because it endangers lives, disrupts discipline, and can compromise operations. Article 134 reinforces the expectation that service members follow orders and respect the dangers of naval and maritime service.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Why is jumping from a vessel punished under the UCMJ?
Because it creates unnecessary danger, disrupts shipboard discipline, and may require rescue operations that risk other lives. The military cannot allow reckless or unauthorized behavior at sea. Punishing such acts deters misconduct and preserves safety.

2. Does the ship need to be at sea for this offense to apply?
No. The offense applies whether the vessel is at sea, anchored, or docked. Unauthorized jumping undermines discipline in any situation. Even in port, the act can discredit the service if witnessed by the public.

3. What is the maximum punishment for this offense?
Confinement for 6 months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and a bad-conduct discharge. While not as severe as violent crimes, the punishment reflects the seriousness of willful disobedience aboard a vessel.

4. What if the accused fell overboard accidentally?
Accidental falls are not punishable under this article. The prosecution must prove the accused willfully and wrongfully jumped. Carelessness may lead to other charges, but it is not jumping from a vessel.

5. Can a jump be justified to save a life?
Yes. If the accused jumped into the water to rescue someone in danger, it is not wrongful. Emergency actions taken to prevent harm are generally lawful. The government must show the act was not justified.

6. Does this offense apply only to Navy personnel?
No. It applies to all service members aboard vessels belonging to or used by the armed forces. Soldiers, Marines, or Air Force personnel on joint missions are also covered. The article enforces discipline across branches.

7. How does this offense impact unit operations?
It diverts resources, interrupts duties, and can trigger emergency protocols. Rescues may risk additional lives and delay missions. The offense exists to prevent such unnecessary disruptions.

8. What if the accused believed they had permission?
If the accused reasonably believed they were authorized, that may be a defense. The prosecution must prove the jump was without lawful authority. Misunderstanding or unclear orders could mitigate liability.

9. Is swimming near ships always prohibited?
Not always. Authorized swim calls or training events are lawful. The offense punishes only unauthorized, willful jumping that undermines order. Discipline and approval are the dividing lines.

10. Why is this offense listed under Article 134 instead of a separate article?
Because it is a specific example of misconduct that harms good order and discredits the service. Article 134 provides a framework for punishing unique behaviors not covered elsewhere. Enumerated offenses like this ensure clarity for service members.

Sources

  • Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934, Article 134 (Jumping from Vessel into the Water)
  • Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024 edition)
  • Navy JAGMAN (Judge Advocate General’s Manual) § 0166
  • Army Regulation 27-10, Military Justice
  • Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Military Justice
  • Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, United States v. Spencer, 29 C.M.R. 458 (1960)
  • Military Attorney Joseph L. Jordan, Articles of the UCMJ web page

This content is for informational purposes only. If you are facing issues related to Article 134 or any other UCMJ provision, you should consult a qualified military attorney.

Related:

  1. UCMJ Article 109 – Waste, Destruction, or Spoilage of Non-Military Property UCMJ Article 109 punishes service members who willfully or recklessly waste, destroy, or damage property that does not belong to the United States military. Unlike Article 108, which deals with U.S. government property, Article 109 applies when the property is...
  2. UCMJ Article 110 – Improper Hazarding of Vessel UCMJ Article 110 punishes any service member who willfully, wrongfully, or negligently endangers a U.S. vessel. Ships are among the most valuable military assets, and their safety is critical not only to national defense but also to the lives of...
  3. UCMJ Article 134 – Carrying a Concealed Weapon This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who wrongfully carry a concealed weapon without proper authority. A “concealed weapon” is any dangerous or deadly instrument hidden on a person or in their immediate control that could be used...
  4. UCMJ Article 134 – Drunkenness (Disorderly Conduct) Under Article 134 of the UCMJ, drunkenness and disorderly conduct are punishable when they are prejudicial to good order and discipline or bring discredit upon the armed forces. Military service demands sobriety, professionalism, and reliability, and drunken behavior that disrupts...
  5. UCMJ Article 133 – Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and Gentleman UCMJ Article 133 criminalizes conduct by commissioned officers, cadets, or midshipmen that dishonors or disgraces them personally, or seriously compromises their standing as officers. The article is intentionally broad, designed to uphold the integrity and character expected of military leaders....
  6. UCMJ Article 134 – Restriction Breaking Restriction breaking is an enumerated offense under Article 134 that punishes service members who unlawfully break restriction imposed by lawful authority. Restriction is a form of non-judicial punishment, pretrial restraint, or administrative control that limits a service member’s movements to...
  7. UCMJ Article 134 – Threat Communicating This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who wrongfully communicate a threat to injure another person, their property, or a third party. Discipline in the armed forces requires trust, respect, and order, and threatening language undermines that foundation....
  8. UCMJ Article 134 – The General Article UCMJ Article 134, known as the “General Article,” is a catch-all provision that criminalizes a wide range of misconduct not specifically addressed in other articles of the UCMJ. It punishes behavior that is prejudicial to good order and discipline in...
  9. UCMJ Article 134 – Unlawful Entry This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who wrongfully enter the property of another without authority. The offense reinforces respect for property rights, privacy, and security. Unlike burglary (Article 129) or housebreaking (Article 130), unlawful entry does not...
  10. UCMJ Article 134 – Bigamy Bigamy is one of the enumerated offenses under UCMJ Article 134, which punishes misconduct that is prejudicial to good order and discipline or that brings discredit upon the armed forces. Bigamy occurs when a service member, while already married, marries...
  11. UCMJ Article 134 – Kidnapping Kidnapping under Article 134 punishes the unlawful seizing, confining, inveigling, decoying, or carrying away of another person against their will. The offense is extremely serious because it violates personal liberty, threatens safety, and undermines public trust in the armed forces....
  12. UCMJ Article 134 – Stolen Property: Knowingly Receiving, Buying, or Concealing This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who knowingly receive, buy, or conceal stolen property. The misconduct is distinct from larceny under Article 121, which covers the actual theft. Here, the offense targets those who benefit from or...
  13. UCMJ Article 100 – Compelling Surrender UCMJ Article 100 punishes any service member who compels or attempts to compel the surrender of a command, unit, post, military property, or personnel to an enemy through misconduct, cowardice, or neglect of duty. This provision addresses the extreme breach...
  14. UCMJ Article 112 – Drunk on Duty UCMJ Article 112 makes it a crime for any service member to be drunk while on duty. The offense applies to all members of the armed forces regardless of rank or position. Because the military requires absolute readiness and discipline,...
  15. UCMJ Article 134 – Firearm, Discharging Through Negligence This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who negligently discharge a firearm. The military holds strict standards for the handling of weapons because negligence with firearms endangers lives, undermines discipline, and damages the reputation of the armed forces....