UCMJ Article 134 – Pandering and Prostitution

This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who engage in prostitution or promote it through pandering. Prostitution is the act of offering or receiving sexual activity for money or other compensation. Pandering occurs when a service member compels, induces, entices, or procures another person to engage in prostitution, or when they profit from the prostitution of others.

Because prostitution undermines military values, damages public trust, and threatens discipline, the UCMJ treats both prostitution and pandering as serious misconduct. The offense also reflects concerns about exploitation, trafficking, and the negative impact such behavior has on unit reputation.


Key Elements

For prostitution:

  1. That the accused engaged in sexual intercourse or conduct for money or other compensation.
  2. That the act was wrongful.
  3. That the conduct was prejudicial to good order and discipline or was of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.

For pandering:

  1. That the accused compelled, induced, enticed, procured, or arranged for a person to engage in sexual acts for compensation.
  2. That the act was wrongful.
  3. That the conduct was prejudicial to good order and discipline or discrediting to the armed forces.

Scope and Application

Article 134 applies to:

  • Service members paying for sex.
  • Service members who profit from or promote prostitution.
  • Brokering sexual acts for money or favors.
  • Exploiting subordinates or vulnerable persons for sexual gain.

It applies worldwide, including overseas duty stations where prostitution may be legal locally. Military law prohibits it regardless of local laws.


Punishment

  • Prostitution: Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for up to 1 year.
  • Pandering: Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for up to 5 years.

Defenses

Possible defenses include:

  • Lack of compensation: If no money, goods, or favors were exchanged.
  • No inducement: For pandering, if the accused did not compel or arrange the act.
  • Consent unrelated to prostitution: Consensual sexual conduct without compensation may not be prostitution.
  • Mistake of fact: If the accused reasonably believed the act did not involve payment or inducement.

Examples

If a soldier pays another person for sex, it is prostitution under Article 134. If a Marine arranges sexual services for others in exchange for money, that is pandering. If an airman receives profits from the prostitution of others, it qualifies. By contrast, consensual relationships without compensation are not punishable under this article.


Conclusion

Article 134 punishes prostitution and pandering to preserve military integrity and discipline. By criminalizing both participation in and promotion of prostitution, the UCMJ protects service members, prevents exploitation, and upholds the reputation of the armed forces.


Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the difference between prostitution and pandering?
Prostitution involves a service member personally engaging in sexual acts for money or other compensation. Pandering involves arranging, profiting from, or inducing another person to engage in prostitution. Pandering is punished more severely because it facilitates or exploits the prostitution of others.

2. Does Article 134 apply overseas where prostitution is legal?
Yes. Even if local laws permit prostitution, military law prohibits it. Service members are held to higher standards worldwide. Local legality does not excuse UCMJ violations. The focus is on protecting discipline and the reputation of the armed forces.

3. What is the maximum punishment for pandering?
Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for up to 5 years. This reflects the military’s condemnation of exploiting others for profit. Pandering is considered more harmful than individual acts of prostitution.

4. Does compensation have to be money?
No. Compensation can include goods, favors, or anything of value. For example, exchanging sexual services for gifts or privileges qualifies. The broad definition prevents loopholes in enforcement.

5. Can consensual relationships be punished as prostitution?
Not if they are based on mutual affection without compensation. The key factor is whether the relationship involves payment or exchange of value. Consensual relationships outside prostitution are not punishable under this article.

6. Can a service member be charged with both prostitution and pandering?
Yes, if they both engage in prostitution and arrange it for others. Prosecutors may charge multiple counts to reflect the full scope of misconduct. Each offense has distinct elements but may arise from the same circumstances.

7. Why does the military prohibit prostitution so strictly?
Because it undermines discipline, exposes members to exploitation, and harms the reputation of the armed forces. Prostitution may also be linked to trafficking and other crimes. The prohibition protects both service members and the public image of the military.

8. What if the accused believed no payment was involved?
A mistake of fact may be a defense if the accused reasonably believed the conduct did not involve compensation. The prosecution must prove knowledge and intent beyond a reasonable doubt. Misunderstanding the situation may reduce liability.

9. Can prostitution be charged under Article 134 without actual sex?
Yes, if the service member agreed to engage in sexual acts for compensation, even if not completed. The agreement itself can be enough if proven. This prevents evasion of accountability by incomplete acts.

10. Why is pandering punished more harshly than prostitution?
Because pandering exploits others, promotes systemic misconduct, and spreads harm beyond a single act. Facilitating or profiting from prostitution undermines discipline more severely. The law recognizes pandering as a leadership failure and abuse of responsibility.


Sources

  • Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934, Article 134 (Pandering and Prostitution)
  • Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024 edition)
  • Army Regulation 27-10, Military Justice
  • Navy JAGMAN (Judge Advocate General’s Manual) § 0166
  • Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Military Justice
  • Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, United States v. Brinson, 49 M.J. 360 (1998)
  • Military Attorney Joseph L. Jordan, Articles of the UCMJ web page

This content is for informational purposes only. If you are facing issues related to Article 134 or any other UCMJ provision, you should consult a qualified military attorney.