UCMJ Article 134 – Quarantine: Medical Breaking

This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who wrongfully break, disregard, or violate a medical quarantine order. Quarantines may be imposed to control the spread of infectious diseases, protect military readiness, and safeguard both the force and surrounding communities. Disobeying quarantine threatens unit health, undermines command authority, and can bring discredit upon the armed forces.

The military has a long history of enforcing health-related restrictions, from preventing outbreaks aboard ships to enforcing isolation during pandemics. This offense ensures compliance with lawful medical directives and emphasizes the responsibility of every service member to protect others.

Key Elements

The prosecution must prove:

  1. That the accused was placed under medical quarantine by lawful authority.
  2. That the accused knew of the quarantine order.
  3. That the accused wrongfully broke or disregarded the quarantine.
  4. That, under the circumstances, the conduct was prejudicial to good order and discipline or was of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.

Scope and Application

This article applies to:

  • Leaving a designated quarantine area without authorization.
  • Ignoring restrictions imposed after exposure to infectious diseases.
  • Failing to comply with isolation orders on ships, bases, or during deployments.
  • Violating restrictions imposed by medical officers or commanders acting under proper authority.

It does not apply to mistakes where the accused did not know of the order or where medical authorities granted proper permission.

Punishment

  • Maximum punishment: Bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for up to 6 months.

Defenses

Possible defenses include:

  • Lack of knowledge: The accused did not know they were under quarantine.
  • Lawful authorization: If the accused left with permission from proper authority.
  • Medical necessity: If leaving quarantine was required to obtain emergency care.
  • Improper order: If the quarantine was not imposed by competent authority.

Examples

If a soldier exposed to a contagious illness leaves quarantine and attends a unit event, Article 134 applies. If a sailor aboard ship ignores quarantine and interacts with the crew, it qualifies. If an airman violates medical isolation rules during a pandemic, it is punishable. By contrast, if a Marine leaves with explicit approval from a doctor or commander, it may not be wrongful.

Conclusion

Article 134 quarantine offenses safeguard military readiness and public trust by ensuring that service members comply with lawful medical restrictions. By punishing violations, the UCMJ emphasizes that individual choices cannot endanger the health and safety of the unit or discredit the armed forces.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Why does the military criminalize breaking quarantine?
Because failing to follow medical restrictions endangers the health of the unit, mission readiness, and civilian communities. Outbreaks can cripple operations, especially aboard ships or during deployments. Strict enforcement prevents reckless behavior that undermines discipline.

2. What is the maximum punishment for breaking quarantine?
Bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for up to 6 months. While less severe than violent crimes, the punishment still reflects the seriousness of disobeying lawful medical orders. Career consequences are often permanent.

3. Does the accused need to know they were under quarantine?
Yes. The prosecution must prove knowledge of the order. If the service member was unaware, liability may not apply. Orders must be clear, specific, and communicated by competent authority.

4. Can emergencies justify leaving quarantine?
Yes. Leaving quarantine to seek emergency medical care or respond to life-threatening circumstances may be lawful. The government must prove the departure was wrongful. Courts evaluate reasonableness and necessity.

5. Does Article 134 apply during pandemics?
Yes. It applies whenever commanders or medical officers lawfully impose quarantine. During pandemics, violations can lead to widespread risk, making enforcement even stricter. The article ensures compliance with public health directives.

6. How does this offense differ from failure to obey orders under Article 92?
Article 92 punishes disobedience of lawful orders generally. Article 134 specifically targets medical quarantine violations, emphasizing their unique risk to health and discipline. Both may apply depending on the case.

7. What if the quarantine was not lawful?
If imposed by someone without authority, the order may not be valid. Quarantine must come from medical officers or commanders empowered by regulations. An invalid order may provide a defense.

8. Can this offense overlap with other charges?
Yes. For example, if a service member breaks quarantine and spreads illness, they may also face charges for dereliction of duty or conduct bringing discredit upon the armed forces. Prosecutors often pursue multiple charges.

9. Does this offense apply only on base?
No. It applies worldwide, on ships, during deployments, or in civilian communities if the service member is subject to a military quarantine order. Jurisdiction follows the member wherever they go.

10. Why is compliance with quarantine so important in the military?
Because military units live and work in close quarters. A single violation can lead to widespread illness, mission failure, or loss of life. Enforcing quarantine protects readiness, discipline, and the credibility of the armed forces.

Sources

  • Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934, Article 134 (Quarantine Offenses)
  • Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2024 edition)
  • Army Regulation 27-10, Military Justice
  • Navy JAGMAN (Judge Advocate General’s Manual) § 0166
  • Air Force Instruction 51-201, Administration of Military Justice
  • Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, United States v. Smith, 29 C.M.R. 4 (1960)
  • Military Attorney Joseph L. Jordan, Articles of the UCMJ web page

This content is for informational purposes only. If you are facing issues related to Article 134 or any other UCMJ provision, you should consult a qualified military attorney.

Related:

  1. UCMJ Article 134 – Reckless Endangerment This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who engage in conduct that recklessly or wantonly creates a substantial risk of death or serious bodily harm to another person. Unlike negligent acts, reckless endangerment requires proof that the accused...
  2. UCMJ Article 134 – Seizure: Destruction, Removal, or Disposal of Property to Prevent This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who destroy, remove, or otherwise dispose of property in order to prevent it from being lawfully seized. The offense is closely tied to maintaining integrity in investigations, inspections, and lawful authority....
  3. UCMJ Article 133 – Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and Gentleman UCMJ Article 133 criminalizes conduct by commissioned officers, cadets, or midshipmen that dishonors or disgraces them personally, or seriously compromises their standing as officers. The article is intentionally broad, designed to uphold the integrity and character expected of military leaders....
  4. UCMJ Article 134 – Violation of Parole This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who, after being granted parole from confinement, violate the conditions of their release. Parole is a privilege that allows an individual to serve part of a sentence under supervision outside confinement....
  5. UCMJ Article 134 – Subornation of Perjury This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who persuade, induce, or procure another person to commit perjury. Because the military justice system depends on truthful testimony, attempting to corrupt witnesses undermines fairness, discipline, and the credibility of the...
  6. UCMJ Article 134 – Wearing Unauthorized Insignia, Decoration, Badge, Ribbon, Device, or Lapel Button This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who wrongfully wear military insignia, decorations, ribbons, badges, devices, or lapel buttons that they are not authorized to wear. The military takes this misconduct seriously because unauthorized wear undermines the integrity...
  7. UCMJ Article 96 – Releasing a Prisoner Without Authority UCMJ Article 96 punishes any service member who, without proper authority, releases or allows the escape of a prisoner in their custody. This provision exists to protect the integrity of military detention and confinement systems. Whether a prisoner is awaiting...
  8. UCMJ Article 134 – The General Article UCMJ Article 134, known as the “General Article,” is a catch-all provision that criminalizes a wide range of misconduct not specifically addressed in other articles of the UCMJ. It punishes behavior that is prejudicial to good order and discipline in...
  9. UCMJ Article 134 – Stolen Property: Knowingly Receiving, Buying, or Concealing This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who knowingly receive, buy, or conceal stolen property. The misconduct is distinct from larceny under Article 121, which covers the actual theft. Here, the offense targets those who benefit from or...
  10. UCMJ Article 134 – Drinking Liquor with Prisoner This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who wrongfully provide, give, or drink liquor with a military prisoner. The offense exists to maintain discipline, good order, and the integrity of confinement or correctional facilities. Drinking liquor with prisoners...
  11. UCMJ Article 134 – Bigamy Bigamy is one of the enumerated offenses under UCMJ Article 134, which punishes misconduct that is prejudicial to good order and discipline or that brings discredit upon the armed forces. Bigamy occurs when a service member, while already married, marries...
  12. UCMJ Article 134 – Mail: Taking, Opening, Secreting, Destroying, or Stealing This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who wrongfully interfere with mail. It covers taking, opening, secreting, destroying, or stealing letters, packages, or other mail matter entrusted to the postal system. Because the military depends on reliable communications...
  13. UCMJ Article 134 – Pandering and Prostitution This enumerated offense under Article 134 punishes service members who engage in prostitution or promote it through pandering. Prostitution is the act of offering or receiving sexual activity for money or other compensation. Pandering occurs when a service member compels,...
  14. UCMJ Article 81 – Conspiracy UCMJ Article 81 establishes liability for conspiracy. It criminalizes the agreement between two or more persons to commit an offense under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, provided that at least one of the conspirators performs an overt act to...
  15. UCMJ Article 112 – Drunk on Duty UCMJ Article 112 makes it a crime for any service member to be drunk while on duty. The offense applies to all members of the armed forces regardless of rank or position. Because the military requires absolute readiness and discipline,...